Katharina Hobgarski vs Sara Dols Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Sep at 03:55 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Hobgarski vs S. Dols

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hobgarski 1 - 0 Dols
They have played 3 sets in total, with Katharina Hobgarski winning 2 and Sara Dols winning 1. The last match between Katharina Hobgarski and Sara Dols was at the W35 Uvero Alto, 13-09-2025, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Katharina Hobgarski getting the victory 6-7(3) 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hobgarski | 1 |
| Dols | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(SF) W35 Uvero Alto(09-13-25)
K. Hobgarski vs S. Dols H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $39,739 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 65.14% (383-205) | Career Total W/L | 59.46% (88-60) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 19 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
K. Hobgarski vs S. Dols Match Preview:
- Dols has a slightly better second serve performance recently, winning 36.5% of points compared to Hobgarski's 35.66%. How significant is this? Generally, it suggests a marginal edge to Dols.
- Regarding return games, Hobgarski performs better on both second and first serves, with 51.06% and 39.05% return points won, respectively, compared to Dols' 49.19% and 36.09%.
- In high-pressure situations, Dols has saved 48.8% of breakpoints, a bit more than Hobgarski's 46.21%, possibly providing a slight advantage when under stress.
- Overall, Hobgarski has a higher match win percentage over the past year, with 70.77% compared to Dols' 54.24%, indicating stronger recent performance.
- Both players prefer clay surfaces, but Hobgarski has an edge with a 68% win rate, whereas Dols has a 62% win rate on clay.
- Examining the level of competition, Hobgarski competes in higher-tier events with a higher 67.35% win rate, suggesting greater experience and tougher competition faced than Dols, who mainly plays in lower-tier events with a 57.14% win rate.
- Average opponent ranking shows Hobgarski facing stronger competitors, with an opponent average rank of 166.08 compared to Dols' 403.75.
- If the match proceeds to a deciding set, Hobgarski's 56% win rate in such scenarios overshadows Dols' 38% record, providing an outlook on match stamina.
- Break point conversion rates favor Hobgarski, who converts 48.72% of opportunities compared to Dols' 35.47%, hinting at greater effectiveness in crucial moments.
Editorial Prediction (September 13, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Dols and Hobgarski presents an interesting clash, with both players showcasing distinct strengths.
Despite both players having their best performances on clay, Hobgarski's superior win percentage on this surface highlights a significant strength. Furthermore, Hobgarski's competition against higher-caliber opponents and higher-tier event participation adds to their advantage in experience.
Hobgarski's better track record in return games, especially crucial under pressure situations and deciding sets, suggests resilience and ability to perform under competitive stress. Additionally, their stronger breakpoint conversion rate indicates greater offensive effectiveness.
Considering all factors, especially the performance trends and quality of recent competition, Hobgarski is likely to emerge victorious in this match.
Katharina Hobgarski vs Sara Dols Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Hobgarski vs S. Dols H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 14 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 3:15:34 | Average Match Time | 3:15:34 |
| 77% (81/105) | 1st Serve % | 73% (66/90) |
| 52% (42/81) | 1st Serve Win % | 41% (27/66) |
| 33% (8/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (10/24) |
| 77% (10/13) | Break Pts Won % | 58% (7/12) |
| 59% (53/90) | Return Points Win % | 52% (55/105) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
K. Hobgarski Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
SF | L | 6-1 4-6 6-0 | ||
QF | W | 7-6(1) 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
S. Dols Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
QF | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R3 | W | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 2-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||

K. Hobgarski vs S. Dols Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.14% (383/205) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.46% (88/60) |
| 62.09% (827/505) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.70% (191/140) |
| 54.65% (6515/5406) | Games Win/Loss | 53.89% (1601/1370) |
| 58.46% (38/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 46.15% (12/14) |
| 68.35% (311/144) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.30% (76/46) |
| 51.52% (34/32) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 323 | Aces Total | 43 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1789 | Total Double Faults | 259 |
| 1:28:7 | Average Match Time | 1:20:35 |
| 542.45 | Average Opponent Rank | 384.82 |
| 67% (23051/34484) | 1st Serve % | 75% (5495/7345) |
| 58% (13307/23051) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (3083/5495) |
| 44% (5074/11432) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (785/1850) |
| 52% (2655/5093) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (494/985) |
| 50% (17599/35114) | Return Points Win % | 48% (3519/7277) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 32.14% (9/19) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 64.27% (250/139) | Challenger W/L | 58.97% (23/16) |
| 74.55% (123/42) | Futures W/L | 59.63% (65/44) |
| 66% (375/570) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (88/148) |
| 57% (4/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (55/102) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (19/35) |
| 60% (96/160) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (20/35) |
| 91% (348/315) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (85/79) |
| 9% (348/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (85/6) |
| 27% (240/65) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (63/9) |